DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN '
Docket No:NR04749-14
28 April 2014
This is in reference to your application for reconsideration
request of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10
usc 1552 on 15 April 2014.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
reconsideration request on 28 April’ 2014. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
As explained in the Board’s original letter to you on 11 March
2014, a case may be reconsidered only upon submission of new and
material evidence. New evidence is defined as evidence not
previously considered by the Board and not reasonably available
to you at the time of your previous application. Evidence is
considered to be material if it is likely to have a substantial
effect on the outcome of the Board’s decision.
Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The information you provided was not new or
material and your reconsideration request has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances,of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
Docket No.NR04749-14
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
Te D> , Ce
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5235 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 28 April 2014. Although the information you provided was new, it was not material information that would change the Board's original decision and your reconsideration request has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3329 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 28 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO03329-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3580 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 14 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO03580-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4148 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 14 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO04148-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6075 14
Evidence is considered to be material if it is likely to have a substantial effect on the outcome of the Board’s decision, On 16 April 2014, our office received your reconsideration request dated 9 April 2014, requesting a reconsideration of your case based on new and material information you provided (a response to the original advisory opinion). Therefore, a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8308 14
However, you allege that you did not receive a copy of the partially favorable advisory opinion (2/0), since you did not agree with the approval dates. As explained in the Board’s previous partial approval letter, a case may only be reconsidered upon submission of new and material evidence. On 14 July 2014, your reconsideration request was approved.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5667 14
on 4 September 2014, you have requested a reconsideration of your case. evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an, official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11934 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2430 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO2430-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...